that the reform aims to favor the poorest and harm the rich clearly appears in the explanatory memorandum of PEC 6/2019, in the topic “Greater equity and social justice” (p. 53): “Some social security rules mean that the richest benefit relatively. (…). Rich people tend to retire earlier and with higher amounts. In general, especially Telegram Number Data in the urban sector, socially more advantaged workers (higher income, formality, stability throughout their working life and better working conditions) tend to retire based on contribution time. That is, without a minimum age, with an average age of 54.6 years in 2018, with an expected benefit of 27.
2 years, and an average value of R$2,231.00”. Yes! The explanatory memorandum of PEC 6 says that anyone who retires with a little more than 2000 reais in benefits is… RICH! Despite the aforementioned constitutional canon that demands administrative morality in Public Administration, this is written as the basis of a Proposed Constitutional Amendment that aims to establish a new pension for the next 40 years [2] . This fallacy reveals the crucial problem of the attack on social rights: the norms that provide for rights (objectives) are repealed, instead of the State promoting the possibility of the poor ascending to a social situation in which they can enjoy the rights (subjective), including social security. In the tension between the social rights of all and the profits of a few, these are preferred, which is extremely serious in any country, but especially in ours, which is among the most unequal on the Planet. On the second front , in Congress, the government has not been able to advance as quickly as its allies wish.