The Court of First Instance Number 1 of a Coruña Has Prevented the Removal of the Elements Disputed by the Franco Family from the Pazo De Meirás, Considering That They Are Real Estate. of the 133 Assets Whose Transfer the Judge Prevents, 54 Are the Subject of Controversy Between the State and the Francos. in the Order, Known This Friday, the Judge States That All the Exteriors and Most of the Interiors Have the Nature of Real Estate Due to Their “Destination or Incorporation.” the Elements of the Garden the Judge Explains That the Exterior Elements, for Example, Those in the Garden , Although They Are Susceptible to Being Moved and "Physically Separable Without Any Damage," Are Real Estate by Destination, Since They Were Placed "With a Desire to Permanence." . and He Adds That, “Whether They Are Figures or Stone Groups (Of Saints and Virgins, Among Others), They Are Placed in the Garden in Order to Achieve a Harmonious and Artistic Whole. the Head of the Court Also Alludes to the Fact That Many of These Elements.
the Subject of Controversy in the Case Opened by the Dictator's Family, "Due to Their Special Robustness and High Weight", Are Difficult to Move Not Only for External Transfer but Also Within the Own Pazo. Interior Elements Regarding the Elements Found Inside, the Magistrate Specifies Each of the Objects, the Majority of a Religious Nature , Which by Incorporation and Destination Have the Nature of Real Estate. Thus, He Refers to Active Phone Number List the Following Inventory: - the Access Door from the Vestibule and the Standing Washbasin with Floral Decoration - the Bulk Sculpture of Saint Joseph - the Altar/sarcophagus - the High Relief of the Pieta - the Virgin Enthroned with the Child - the Round Sculptures in Stone - the Holy Water Font - the Wooden Confessional - the Praying Virgin - the Round Christ - the Bronze Angels - the Lamp on the Pilaster of the Staircase - the Metal Wall Sconces - the Tapestry with Shield - a Pair of Sconces Electrified… Tweet from the Superior Court of Justice of Galicia by Incorporation.
Like a Sink Pic.twitter.com/4qonpapueo — Tsxg (@Tsxgalicia) July 15, 2022 Location Regarding These Assets, the Judge Considers Key When Analyzing Each of Them "The Location, Putting It in Relation to the Purpose Pursued When Placing It in a Certain Place", as Well as "The Relationship and Homogeneous Vision That Can Be Formed with Other Existing Elements.” in the Document, It Indicates That “A Large Part of the Elements Discussed” Are Found on the Main Altar of the Chapel. Thus, He States That, Although “There Is No Controversy” That the Carvings Can Be Moved “Without Affecting or Deteriorating the Pedestal or Each of the Altarpieces Where They Are Placed,” He Understands That “It Cannot Be Ignored, Given the Characteristics of "Them, Their Dimensions, Their Position and the Interrelation That Exists Between Them, Which Respond to the Idea of Forming an Iconographic Group." Furthermore, He Emphasizes That "They Are in Harmony with the Architecture and Typology of the Altarpiece (From the End of the 17th Century, Beginning of the 18th Century) and Their Own Dimensions, Which Leads to Affirming That Placed for Decorative Purposes And, Above All, with a Clear Will of Permanence, Which Means That They Are Considered Real Estate by Destination.